| |
High
Distinction
|
Distinction
|
Credit
|
Pass
|
Fail
|
|
Criterion 1
Learning Outcome 3 Outline the common categories of mental illness (of the specified illness) and explore the comorbidities and evidencebased treatments;
30%
|
The MMI is explored in excellent detail providing information about the aetiology of the illness and statistical evidence about potential causes. Signs and symptoms are discussed well
|
The MMI is explored to good detail, is thorough but needs further detail. Signs and symptoms and aetiology are discussed well but needs further detail
|
The MMI is discussed well but needs more detail to demonstrate complete understanding of the disorder. Signs and symptoms, aetiology are covered but needs further clarification
|
The MMI is discussed at basic level and requires ongoing understanding of the disorder
|
The MMI is not discussed well and does not demonstrate thorough understanding of the disorder. Misunderstand ings of the disorder are frequent.
|
|
Criterion 2
Learning Outcome 4
Explain the concepts that underpin mental health, its associated care and its relationship to maintaining physical health;
20%
|
Aspects of physical health is well described including monitoring of physical health in relation to the MMI. Includes how and/or why the MMI can cause or be associated with physical comorbidities
|
Physical health and the MH disorder is discussed and connected together. Monitoring discussion is at very good standard
|
Physical health is discussed in relation to the MH disorder including monitoring but needs much further detail
|
Physical health and the MH disorder is discussed in relation to each other. Monitoring of physical health is basic and briefly discussed though not in detail
|
No discussion or reflection about how the MH disorder impacts physical illness. Monitoring of physical health not covered
|
|
Outcome 5
Describe the elements of the therapeutic relationship in mental health nursing appropriate to diverse individuals (at least one diverse group identified eg: LGBTIQ, Indigenous Australian , including its relationship to positive outcomes for the person;
20%
|
Therapeutic relationships in MH nursing is discussed at
high standard
level;
discussion
includes
consideration
of diverse
individuals.
Discussion of
how
therapeutic
relationships
lead to better
outcomes for
the person
|
Therapeutic
Relationships discussed to good standard. Includes consideration of therapeutic relationship in diverse group but needs more detail. Discussion of benefits to person explored
|
Therapeutic
relationships
discussed but needs further
detail.
Consideration
of benefits to
patient present
but not
completely
reached
|
Therapeutic
Relationships
discussed but
at basic level.
Some
discussion of
therapeutic
relationships
needed within
diverse groups
with some link
to positive
outcomes or
benefits for a
person
discussed.
Diverse
individuals not
factored into
discussion in
regards to
therapeutic
relationship/int
ervention.
Relationships
or benefits of
therapeutic
intervention
|
Therapeutic
relationships in
MH nursing
Poorly discussed.
Diverse
individuals not
factored into
discussion in
regards to
therapeutic
relationship/int
ervention.
Relationships
or benefits of
therapeutic
intervention
not reflected
|
|
Criterion 4
Learning Outcome 7
Identify common psychotherapy modalities utilised by mental health practitioners;
20%
|
Common and accepted psychotherap ies are discussed including psychopharm -acological and nonpsychopharm acological in excellent detail. Consideratio ns are made about: potential side-effects and patient’s choices
|
Common psychopharmac ological and nonpsychopharmac ological are discussed to good level but needed finer details. Side effects and patient’s choices are discussed but further detail needed
|
Common psychopharma cological and nonpsychopharma cological are discussed but is brief and/or vague. Considerations about side effects and patient choices not overtly considered
|
Common
psychopharma
cological and
nonpsychopharma
cological
interventions
discussed but
too briefly.
Side-effects
and patient’s
choices not
considered
well
|
Common
psychopharma
cological and
nonpsychopharma
cological
interventions
discussed
poorly Sideeffects and
patient’s
choices not
considered
|
|
Referencing
and writing
style
10%
|
High standard of writing skill and referencing including 10+ references accurately used
|
Standard of writing is good and referencing is used well with accurate referencing of 10+ sources with minor errors
|
Writing standard is within good standards but needs clarification at times. Referencing has some errors
|
Writing style is with accepted standard, referencing needs further work. References are within accepted sources
|
Writing style is poor with frequent grammatical errors. Referencing is poor with below standard usage and sources
|
