Hypothetical Problem

Assessment Information COMMONWEA L TH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Assessment 2 Information Subject Code: HAT205 Subject Name: Gaming and Entertainment Management in Hospitality and Tourism Assessment Title: Hypothetical P roblem Assessment Type : Length: In - class role - playing activity and individual proposal debriefing speech: 5 minutes (no more) Proposal: 7 00 words (+/ - 10% allowable range) Weighting: 30 % Total Marks: Submission: 100 In - class and o nline Due Date: Week 9 & 10 Your task You are required to participate in a role - play activity and write a 7 00 - word proposal addressing a hypothetical problem. Assessment Description In this individual a ssessment , students will be given an opportunity to examine the types of gaming and entertainment activities undertaken in the hospitality and tourism markets more closely . More importantly, students will form an understating of the managerial problems related to technological disruption in the gaming and entertainment industries. Assess ment Instructions During week 8 , your workshop facilitator will form the class into pairs. Once creat ed, you and your partner A ttendance is mandatory so that you can a) get acquainted with your partner and b) discuss you r team working style by review ing th e team inventory questionnaire results . Your workshop facilitator will provide further guidance on the day of your scheduled class. During week 9 , you and your partner must participate in a 60 - minute role - playing activity in which you are to assume the role of dual leadership: one person will take on the role of the entertainment manager, whil e the other person will take on the role of the venue manager. Your workshop facilitator will provide you with a hypothetical proble m at the start of this activity. Once received, you and your partner are required to collaboratively discuss potential solutions based on the hypothetical problem perspective . Upon the conclusion of the role - playing activity, the pairs must deliver a 5 - minute debriefing speech to the workshop facilitator and classmates by outlining the main points of the discussion. By the beginning of week 10 , individually, you are required to submit a 7 00 word written proposal bas ed on the role - playing activity, in which you must provide three managerial recommendations addressing the problem from your perspective. Each recommendation should be supported with r elevant sources of information and industry - specific examples that validate what you have proposed. These must be referenced in accordance with Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. Workshop slides, Wikipedia Assessment Information COMMONWEA L TH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. A ssessment Submission The proposal file must be submitted as a document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission. MyKBS will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your workshop facilitator via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screenshot of the MyKBS error message. You are also encouraged to submit yo ur work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any possible delay involving the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties that may occur . Late assignment submission penalties Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Number of days Penalty 1 * - 9 days 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available 10 - 14 days 50% deducted from the total marks available. After 14 days Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted , and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). Note Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students * Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/about - us/school - policies Assessment Information COMMONWEA L TH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. Important Study Information Academic Integrity Policy KBS values academic integrity . All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy. What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties? How can I appeal my g rade? Click here for answers to these questions: https://www.kbs.edu.au/about - us/school - policies Time Limits for Presentation Assessments Submissions that exceed the time limit will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Word Limits for Written Assessments Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded. Study Assistance Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information. COMMONWEA L TH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B. HAT205 Assessment 2 Marking Rubric Hypothetical Problem 30 % Marking Criteria (__/100) F (Fail) 0 - 49 % P (Pass) 50 - 64 % C (Credit) 65 - 7 4 % D (Distinction) 75 - 84 % HD (High Distinction) 85 - 100 % In - class Grou p Activity : Collaboration __/2 0 marks As a result of limited or no collaboration, your pair has presented irrelevant or no solutions to the hypothetical problem. As a result of collaboration, your pair has presented somewhat relevant solutions to the hypothetical problem. As a result of co llaboration, your pair has presented mostly relevant solutions to the hypothetical problem. As a result of effective collaboration, your pair has presented relevant solutions to the hypothetical problem. As a result of effe ctive collaboration, your pair has presented well - thought - out solutions to the hypothetical problem. Individual Proposal : Recommendations __/ 30 marks You have proposed unclear or no recommendation that demonstrates limited or no understanding of the hypothetical problem from perspective. You have proposed three recommendations that demonstrate a developing understanding of the hypothetical problem from your You have proposed three recommendations that demonstrate an adequate understanding of the hypothetical problem from your You have proposed three recommendations that demonstrate a sufficient understanding of the hypothetical problem from your You have proposed three recommendations that demonstrate an expert understanding of the hypothetical perspective. Individual Proposal: Use of sources/supporting evidence __/20 marks Your research lacks focus and/or you have chosen unsuitable or bogus sources and/or examples , which do not link to the required assessment task. You have attempted to support your recommendations with superficial and/or somewhat rel e vant selection and/or range of sources and/or examples . You have supported your recommendations with an adequate selection and/or range of relevant sources and examples . You have supported your recommendations with a sufficient selection and ra nge of relevant sources and exampl es . You have supported your recommendations with an excellent selection and range of relevant sources and examples . Individual Proposal: Format __/10 marks The format chosen for your proposal is inappropriate and/or lacks thought and consideration for the intended audience. The format chosen for your proposal is appropriate, but further attention to detail would improve its presentation. The format chosen for your proposal is appropriate, but minor changes would enhance its presentation. Your proposal is professionally presented and has been submitted in the appropriate format. Your proposal is professionally presented and exceeds expectations for what is suitable for a business environment. I ndividual Proposal: Grammar/Spelling __/10 marks Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect. It impacts the flow and readability of your proposal. Though there are some errors in grammar and spelling, these do not detract from the readability and flow of your proposal. Mostly correct grammar and spelling , but any errors do not impact readability and flow . Errors in grammar and spe lling are rare, which enhances the readability and flow of your proposal. Perfect grammar and spelling throughout, which enhances the readability and flow of your proposal. Individual Proposal: In - text Citations and Referencing __/10 marks Neither in - text referencing and reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. In - text referencing or the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style , with some errors. Both in - text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style , with some errors. Both in - text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with only occasional minor errors. Both in - text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere strictly to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with no errors. F eedback and Grades will be released via MyKBS